A batch of fake 1-star reviews can be bought from public broker networks for roughly $89. Removing the damage is slow and rarely fully succeeds.

97 of 100 founding slots left

One token = one review tied to a real transaction a competitor can't invent.

You spend a token to invite one real customer to leave one review, permanently tied to their actual transaction. To fake it, someone would have to fake a sale in a ledger they don't control — and your Google profile never moves.

Each token = one verified review tied to a real transaction. 10 included free, no card · Founding 100: 97 of 100 slots left

AU data residencyFounder replies personallyNo lock-in

Your Google profile stays exactly where it is. Rogger is the proof layer underneath it. See the whole mechanism →

Founding 100 · forming now
$49/month, locked for life. The first 100 only.

Founding members lock the rate for the life of the account — then tell us, in their own words, why they backed Rogger and the fake review that drove them here. Their testimonials appear here as they join: real operators, no stock quotes.

Used byDentistsRestaurantsLaw FirmsPhysio PracticesHair SalonsReal Estate AgentsRetail Stores
Founding 10097 of 100 lifetime slots left · $49/mo for life
Claim a slot
The mechanism

How a review becomes one a competitor can't touch

Not a promise — a process. Here's a token's whole life; the full version lets you audit a real review yourself.

  1. Real transaction

    A customer pays for a real job. The business records it — date, type, value band, customer contact.

    the anchor
  2. Token minted

    A token is bound to that exact transaction. The balance drops by one, atomically. An audit log is written.

    finite · logged
  3. Private link

    Only that customer gets the unique link or QR. Not public. Not reusable.

    1 token = 1 person
  4. Customer reviews

    They review the way they always would — now tied to a real transaction.

    no token ⇒ no form
  5. Anchored forever

    Stored as “verified at transaction” on the public profile and widget.

    ledger is Rogger’s
See it in action

A customer review, from token to Google

Watch how Smile Bright Dental uses Rogger to collect a verified review — confirmation, rating, media, and one-click to Google.

Demo video coming soon

Smile Bright Dental · full review flow

See the interactive demo →🎮 Try live demo — no signup
Step 1

Token invitation

Smile Bright sends a branded link to a real customer.

Step 2

Two-sided confirmation

The customer confirms they received the service — proof of a real transaction.

Step 3

Review + Google

They rate, optionally record media, and jump straight to Google.

Now the part the mechanism protects

What an unanchored review costs when it's weaponised.

You've seen how a review gets anchored. Put your own numbers in. The model uses only the published Harvard/Luca 2016 figure and halves it — directional, not a guarantee.

$
1

One coordinated attack can be a single batch of fake 1-stars.

Compare against plan

Loading plans…

Estimated revenue at risk / year
$30,000
$30,000 per attack × 1
Verified per year$588
Pays for itself if it prevents<1 attack
At your numbers, Verified pays for itself many times over — $30,000 at risk vs $588 a year.
Show the math (deliberately conservative)

revenue at risk = annual revenue × 2.5% × attacks

We start from the Harvard Business School finding (Michael Luca, “Reviews, Reputation, and Revenue: The Case of Yelp.com”, 2016) that a one-star rating shift correlates with a 5–9% change in small-business revenue. We take the bottom of that range (5%) and assume one attack only drags your rating down by half a star — so 5% × ½ = 2.5% of revenue per attack. Real attacks are often worse; this keeps the estimate honest and low-balled.

Source: Michael Luca, Harvard Business School (2016). Figures are an illustrative estimate, not a guarantee of outcomes.

What the research actually says

Four numbers — each one with a real, public source.

No marketing-team figures. Every stat below links to peer-reviewed research, a regulator, or a platform disclosure you can check yourself.

5–9%
Revenue change per 1-star rating

A one-star shift in a business’s rating correlates with a 5–9% change in revenue. Reproduced across verticals.

Source · Harvard Business School · Michael Luca (2016)
$0
Paid by platforms for fake-review damage

No major, publicly-documented case in any jurisdiction where Google has been ordered to pay a business damages for hosting fake reviews. The loss falls on you.

Source · S.230 CDA · eCD 2000/31/EC · Google v Defteros [2022] HCA 27
4%
Max EU fine of turnover for fake reviews

The EU Omnibus Directive (applied 28 May 2022, 27 member states) prohibits commissioning or misrepresenting consumer reviews; cross-border penalties up to 4% of annual turnover.

Source · EU Directive 2019/2161 (Omnibus)
~$89
Public broker price to attack you

A competitor can buy a batch of fake 1-star reviews at roughly this price from publicly listed broker networks. A Google review is free, so faking one is cheap.

Source · Public fake-review broker pricing
Illustration · what an attack looks like on a Tuesday morning

This is how it actually happens.

An illustration of the pattern we see. The names and the timeline are illustrative; the revenue figure is extrapolated from the cited Harvard/Luca research, not a guarantee.

MON · 23:47

Your best month ever.

You close the week humming. A wall of real reviews. 4.9 stars. New customers coming in. Bookings two weeks out. You've earned this.

google.com/search · verified business near me
AD
Best Rated · Local Business
★★★★★4.9(illustration)
Professional services · Open 8 AM – 6 PM
New customers this month · bookings 2 weeks out
TUE · 06:47

A batch of 1-stars overnight.

You pick up your phone and your stomach drops. A batch of 1-star reviews, all posted within the hour, all from accounts created this week, all single-sentence. "Worst service ever." "Dirty." "Unprofessional." Your rating just dropped to 3.4. A competitor paid roughly $89 for this.

google.com/search · verified business near me
AD
Best Rated · Local Business
★★★★★3.4(illustration)
Professional services · Open 8 AM – 6 PM
Worst clinic ever2m ago
Unprofessional4m ago
Dirty7m ago
more in the same batch
TUE · 09:15

You file the appeals. One per review.

Each one explaining that this reviewer has never been a customer. Google responds within minutes: "Thanks for reporting — reviews will be reviewed within 7 days." You refresh the page hourly. Nothing changes.

support.google.com · report a review
Tell us what's wrong with this review:
This review is from an account created yesterday. The reviewer has never been a customer. I have no record of…
Submit report
Reviews will be reviewed within 7 days
one per review
WEEK 02

The phone stops ringing.

New customer enquiries fall. Prospects search you, see 3.4 stars, scroll to the next business. You don't see the customers you're losing. You only see an empty Thursday afternoon and you don't know why.

New customer enquiries
Falling
after the attack
attack
Week 0Week 1Week 2Week 3
WEEK 03

Google removes a few. The rest stay. Indefinitely.

Most of the fakes are not removed. They will drag your average down — for as long as they sit there. Google will not compensate you. No regulator will compensate you. This is now your baseline.

Removed by Google
A few
The remaining fakes permanently drag your average.
WITH ROGGER

The attack becomes self-defeating.

Every real review has a verified transaction underneath it. A prospect reading your reviews can click through to see the transaction details for any one of them. Fake reviews have no anchor. There's nothing to click. The difference is visible at a glance. You embed the verified wall on your site. Prospects trust it. The phone keeps ringing.

Example Business · verified reviews
4.9 ★ · verified
★★★★★GOLD
✓ verified
"Best service I've had."
service_booking · 14 May · verified at point of sale
★★★★★GOLD
✓ verified
"Best service I've had."
consultation · 9 May · verified at point of sale
★★★★★SILVER
✓ verified
"Best service I've had."
follow_up · 2 May · verified at point of sale
more — every one tied to a real transaction
The math of doing nothing

A sustained 1-star drop on a $1.2M AUD business maps to roughly $60k–$108k of lost revenue a year, until the rating recovers.

Directional — extrapolated from Michael Luca, Harvard Business School (2016): a 1-star shift ≈ 5–9% of revenue. Not a guarantee.

Founding 100 costs $49/month — locked for life. Run your own numbers in the calculator above.

Through your customer's eyes

What your customer sees when they click a verified review.

They don't need to know what Rogger is. The proof speaks before the brand does.

01

They notice the badge — and click it.

Your customer reads your reviews on your website or your Rogger profile. Under one of them they see a small "✓ Verified" badge and a "View anchor →" link. They've never heard of Rogger. They click anyway — because the badge is there and curiosity is free.

02

They land on the proof page.

They see the transaction date. The service category — "service_booking", "dinner_reservation", "legal_consultation". A line that says: this review is tied to a real transaction. They don't need to know what that means technically. They know what a transaction date means. They feel the difference.

03

They go back. They book.

Not because they understand transaction anchoring. Because they clicked on one review and found something real underneath it — and that's more than they found anywhere else they looked.

Trust is visceral before it's rational. The badge, the click-through, the transaction proof — these signal authenticity at a gut level before the brain catches up.

Every trust standard starts this way. SSL certificates. Hygiene ratings. Fair-trade marks. Nobody explained HTTPS to consumers in 2005 — they just felt safer when the padlock appeared. Nobody had to explain the absence of it either.

Rogger works the same way. Your customers don't need to know what Rogger is. They need to find something real when they look. Right now, your competitors give them nothing to find.

The badge works before the brand is famous.
That's the point.

From the founder

We're in early access with 100 founding businesses.

Rogger is brand new. We're onboarding the first 100 businesses personally — that means I, the founder, will be your direct contact through setup, your first verified reviews, and the moment you embed your verified wall on your own site. You'll have my email and my mobile.

When the cohort fills, real customer testimonials will live here — with names, photos, and the specific fakes Rogger helped them prove fake. Until then, the offer is simple: be one of the first 100, and lock $49/mo for life.

Abraham Zacharia
Founder, Rogger · [email protected]
Founding 10097 of 100 lifetime slots left. Once they fill, the rate moves to $149/month publicly.
Public record · global · not hypothetical

Regulators, courts, and the platforms themselves admit it.

US · EU · UK · Australia. Every one of these is publicly documented — search the headline and you'll find it.

2023United States
Google LLC v Ethan Hu et al.

Google sues the operators selling fake reviews

Google filed a civil suit against the operators of websites selling bulk fake Google business reviews. In its public filing, Google described the defendants as running an organised fake-review operation — and said it had previously removed hundreds of thousands of reviews linked to them.

Filing · US District Court, Northern District of California
2022European Union
EU Directive 2019/2161 (Omnibus Directive)

Fake reviews made unlawful across the EU

The EU Omnibus Directive explicitly prohibits publishing, commissioning or misrepresenting consumer reviews. Member-state maximum penalties for cross-border infringements: up to 4% of the offender's annual turnover. Applies to any business selling into the EU.

Filing · Applied 28 May 2022 across 27 member states
2022United States
US FTC v Fashion Nova LLC

US FTC settlement over suppressed reviews

The FTC alleged Fashion Nova blocked publication of hundreds of thousands of low-star reviews on its own site. The company agreed to a payment to settle. The FTC's stated position: suppressing negative reviews is a deceptive practice under the FTC Act.

Filing · FTC file no. 192-3138 · Jan 2022
2023United Kingdom
UK CMA · fake-review enforcement

Commitments secured from major platforms

After consumer-group investigations (including by Which?) exposed bundled fake-review sales, the UK CMA publicly reported securing commitments from major platforms to strengthen detection and removal — with the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act expanding CMA enforcement powers from 2024.

Filing · Competition & Markets Authority press releases 2023
2018Australia
ACCC v Meriton Property Services

A$3 million penalty

The Federal Court fined Meriton $3M for "masking" approximately 14,500 guest email addresses to prevent likely-negative TripAdvisor reviews from being requested. The deceptive conduct was specifically about manipulating which reviews ever existed — exactly the integrity gap Rogger's transaction-anchor mechanic closes.

Filing · Federal Court of Australia
2020Australia
ACCC v HealthEngine

A$2.9 million penalty

HealthEngine paid $2.9M for failing to publish approximately 17,000 negative customer reviews and editing approximately 3,000 reviews to remove or alter negative content (2015-2018). The single most relevant Australian enforcement precedent for businesses and the regulators watching them.

Filing · Federal Court of Australia
2022Australia
ACCC v Trivago N.V.

A$44.7 million penalty

The Federal Court of Australia ordered Trivago N.V. to pay A$44.7M in penalties after earlier findings that its hotel-rankings were misleading to consumers. Regulators regularly pursue the largest actors — but small businesses targeted by fake reviews rarely see the enforcement personally.

Filing · Federal Court of Australia (22 April 2022)
2020–2022US · UK
Amazon v fake-review brokers · multiple civil actions

Amazon sues fake-review broker networks

Amazon has brought multiple civil actions against operators of fake-review broker networks running through Facebook groups, Telegram and WhatsApp — publicly naming the defendants and describing the scale in its filings. The problem has persisted through repeated enforcement cycles.

Filing · Amazon.com Services LLC filings

The pattern is the same in every jurisdiction we've looked at: platforms report they can't fully stop fake reviews, regulators move years after the damage is done, and any financial penalty against fraudsters is paid to the state — not to the business that lost the revenue. The only move left is to anchor your real reviews to real transactions — before the attack.

All sources above are publicly available regulatory filings, court decisions, or peer-reviewed research as of their cited date. We reference these cases and sources to document the existence and scale of the fake-review problem — we make no claim beyond what the primary sources themselves state.

Why Google will never fix this for you

Google has never paid a cent for a fake review on its own platform.

There is no major, publicly-documented case — in any jurisdiction — where Google has been ordered to pay damages specifically for hosting fake business reviews. The legal shields are airtight. The damage falls entirely on the business being attacked.

Total paid to businesses damaged by fake reviews on Google
$0
Across US · EU · UK · AU · to date of publication
Why — four shields, four jurisdictions
United States
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Near-total immunity for user-generated content. Analogues: Kimzey v Yelp (9th Cir. 2016), Hassell v Bird (Cal. Sup. Ct. 2018).

European Union
e-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC · Digital Services Act 2024

"Mere host" doctrine until on notice. Practical outcome: takedown eventually, damages never.

Australia
Google LLC v Defteros [2022] HCA 27

High Court ruled Google is not a publisher of hyperlinked search content in most circumstances. Narrows review-hosting liability to near zero.

United Kingdom
e-Commerce inheritance · Online Safety Act 2023

Hosting-provider defences preserved. The Online Safety Act targets illegal content and child safety, not fake-review damages.

What Google HAS paid — and it's never for fake reviews
CNIL (France) — GDPR consent€50M
ACCC (Australia) — misleading location dataA$60M
EU Commission — antitrust (cumulative)>€8B
For fake reviews on its platform$0

Regulators collect billions from Google for privacy and antitrust — all paid to governments, none of which reaches the businesses damaged by fake reviews. The legal system treats fake-review damage as a cost your business absorbs.

The legal system has made its position clear: fake-review damage is a cost your business absorbs. Regulators collect billions from Google — every cent goes to governments, not to you.

Your only move is to tie your real reviews to real transactions before the attack arrives. That's all Rogger is. That's all it needs to be.

Side by side

Same five stars. Completely different situation.

Here's what changes when every review is tied to a verified transaction underneath it.

Who can post
Google review
Anyone, incl. competitors & bots
Rogger review
Only a customer with a real recorded transaction
Cost to fake
Google review
$0
Rogger review
Requires a fake transaction in a ledger you don't control
If you’re attacked
Google review
You appeal to Google and wait
Rogger review
The fake can't be created in the first place
Legal recovery from Google
Google review
$0 — Section 230 / hosting immunity
Rogger review
You own the proof layer independently
Your reviews if Google suspends you
Google review
Gone permanently
Rogger review
Portable — embedded on your own site
Prospect trust
Google review
Based on star count alone
Rogger review
Based on verifiable transaction proof
New leads from Rogger directory
Google review
None
Rogger review
Verified businesses listed at rogger.io/customers
The only difference that matters

Same five stars. Only one is tied to a real transaction.

When a prospect reads your Google reviews and a competitor's, they can't tell yours are real. Put a Rogger-verified transaction underneath every one and the difference becomes undeniable.

Anywhere on the open web
★★★★★Jane D.

“Amazing service. Highly recommend!”

No transaction link
No transaction evidence
Could be anyone, including a bot
Anchored on Rogger
★★★★★Jane D.Gold tier

“Amazing service. Highly recommend!”

Transaction · 2026-04-18 · service_booking
Verified at point of sale · publicly viewable

Three steps. Sixty seconds.

1.

Customer transacts

Invoice paid, appointment done, order shipped — same as always. No workflow change for you.

2.

Rogger mints a Sight Token

A one-time, single-use token lands in their inbox or SMS — from your address, on your domain.

3.

Only they can review

No token, no review. No bots. No drive-bys. No fakes. Ever.

The part most people ask about

Why a business can't just fake the transaction.

“Tied to a real transaction” only means something if the business can't invent the transaction. Here is exactly what stops that — in plain language.

01

The invitation is a single-use token.

A review invitation is issued only when a transaction is recorded — and it is a one-time, single-use token. It works once, for one review, then it is spent. A business can't reuse it, mint extra copies, or hand it around to people who never transacted.

02

The customer confirms the transaction first.

Before a rating can be submitted, the customer has to confirm the transaction actually happened — the service, the date, the amount. A fabricated transaction has no real customer on the other end willing to confirm it.

03

Every review links to inspectable metadata.

Each verified review carries a link to its transaction metadata — date, service category, token id — viewable by anyone on the public verify page. Reviews that aren't anchored to a transaction have nothing to show there. The gap is visible to any prospect who looks.

04

No transaction evidence, no published review.

Rogger never lets a business publish a review for a customer it has no transaction evidence for. There is no manual path to add a review by hand. If the transaction isn't in the ledger, the review doesn't exist on Rogger.

We don't claim this stops every bad actor. It raises the cost of a fake review from free and instant to needing a real, confirmable transaction behind every single one. That is the entire point: a verified review is anchored to evidence anyone can check, and an unverified one has nothing to point to.

Founding 100 · lifetime offer

Lock in $49/month for life. 97 of 100 slots left.

First 100 businesses on Rogger get Pro-tier ($149/mo value) for $49/mo, locked for life. Concierge onboarding, Founding badge on your profile, top placement in the customers directory.

97 of 100 lifetime slots remaining0/100 claimed
  • 14-day trial
  • No card
  • 10 tokens included
  • $49 founding lock-for-life
  • Cancel anytime
  • AU-hosted
The word 'free' is doing a lot of work

“Google Reviews is free.”
So is an unlocked door.

You don't have to leave Google. Your Google Business Profile stays exactly where it is — that's still how most customers find you, and that doesn't change.

What Rogger adds is the layer underneath that makes your reviews defensible, portable, and tied to real transactions. You run both. You own both.

Here's what the free layer is actually costing you that Google doesn't bill.

01

Anyone can post a review about you. Not just customers.

Competitors. Ex-employees. People who never walked through your door. Bot farms. AI scripts. Google's written policy requires users to have actually used the service — there is no verification mechanism. Not one.

Source · Google's own review policy — enforcement is reactive, not preventative
02

You can't take down a review you know is fake.

You file an appeal. It goes to a queue. Google's own transparency disclosures admit the majority of disputed reviews stay up. Appeal is a suggestion, not a remedy.

Source · Google transparency disclosures · Google Business Profile help docs
03

Fake positives help your competitor. Fake negatives hurt you. You absorb both.

Neither Google nor any regulator compensates you. The penalties against fake-review brokers — when they happen — go to governments, not the businesses damaged. No legal pathway ends with money in your account.

Source · Section 230 CDA · eCD 2000/31/EC · Google v Defteros [2022] HCA 27
04

Google owns your review history. You don't.

If your Business Profile gets suspended — mistakenly, or by a staff-policy tripwire — your genuine 5-stars vanish. No export. No portable backup. No court will make Google restore them.

Source · Google Business Profile terms of service
05

Prospects can't tell your real reviews from fake ones.

The 5-stars your competitor just bought look identical to the 5-stars your real customers left. Your prospect's brain averages them together, subtracts a little for caution, then picks whoever still has the highest number. That's how the loss compounds.

Source · Review economics (Luca, Harvard 2016) — buyers act on the aggregate rating, not a per-review audit
Rogger closes all five. Without asking you to leave Google.

Every review you collect through Rogger is tied to a real transaction in our verified ledger. A prospect can click the verify link and see the exact transaction metadata. Unverified reviews have no anchor — they stand out by absence.

Your Google Business Profile stays exactly where it is. Rogger is the layer underneath that makes your reviews defensible, portable, and traceable back to a real transaction. You own them. You embed them. You prove them. For $49/month locked for life on Founding 100.

The five things you're already arguing in your head

You're probably thinking one of these things.

"I already have great Google reviews — I don't need this yet."

The businesses hit hardest by fake-review attacks all had great ratings. That's the point — a 4.9 drops further and faster than a 3.8. The only time to install a proof layer is before the attack, not after. After is too late — the damage is already compounding.

"Google will fix it if I report the reviews."

Google's own transparency disclosures confirm that the majority of disputed reviews remain live after appeal. You are filing a suggestion, not a remedy. The appeals process exists to give you somewhere to direct your frustration — not to give you your rating back.

"I don't want to ask my customers to use a platform they've never heard of."

You don't ask them to do anything differently. Your Google Business Profile stays exactly where it is — customers still find you on Google, still leave reviews on Google. Rogger sends your customer a token after their transaction. They click it, leave a review the way they normally would. The difference is that review is now tied to their real transaction in our verified ledger — and only customers with a verified transaction can leave one.

"Will my customers actually trust a Rogger-verified review if they've never heard of Rogger?"

Yes — and they don't need to have heard of it first. When a prospect clicks a verified review and finds a real transaction date, a real service category, a single-use review token — they feel the difference before they understand it. Trust is visceral before it's rational. SSL certificates worked before consumers knew what HTTPS meant. Hygiene ratings worked before diners understood food safety law. The badge builds trust at the point of decision. Consumer recognition of the Rogger badge follows from that — business by business, category by category. You're not waiting for that moment. You're creating it.

"Is this legal? Is it compliant with GDPR / Australian Consumer Law / FTC rules?"

The Rogger token system is designed to comply with GDPR (EU), the EU Omnibus Directive 2019/2161, Australian Consumer Law, and FTC guidelines. We don't publish reviews on your behalf — we verify the transaction behind reviews your customers choose to write, and only customers we have transaction evidence for can submit a review.

Full legal & compliance detail →

"$49/month feels expensive for a small business."

The published Harvard/Luca 2016 research puts a one-star rating shift at 5–9% of revenue. Run your own revenue through the calculator above — the trade-off against $49/month (Founding 100, locked for life) is usually not close. This is directional, not a guarantee, but the maths is transparent and conservative.

Not just a shield

Rogger isn't just a shield. It's a new lead channel.

Every verified business gets listed in the Rogger directory — ranked in Google search for customers actively looking for trusted, verified businesses.

01

Your verified profile lives at rogger.io/customers/[your-business]

Every real review you collect through Rogger appears here — each one anchored, each one verifiable. Founding 100 members get top-of-directory placement.

02

The Rogger directory ranks in Google search.

When a consumer searches "trusted business [city]", "verified reviews [service] near me", or "[category] with real reviews" — Rogger-listed businesses appear. You get discovery traffic from customers who are specifically filtering for trust. These are your highest-converting leads.

03

Your verified review wall embeds anywhere.

Your website. Email signature. Invoices. Google Business Profile posts. Instagram bio. Every surface where the badge appears is a new touchpoint that builds consumer recognition of Rogger — and brings that recognition back to your business.

Your Google profile brings leads through Google. Rogger brings leads through trust. Founding 100 members are the first businesses in their category with both working at the same time.

Founding 100 · 97 of 100 slots remaining

Be the most trusted business in your category — before your competitors know this exists.

Founding 100 members lock in $49/month for life. The real advantage isn't the price — it's being first. After Founding 100 fills, Pro goes to $149/month publicly.

Founding 100 — Lifetime rate
$149/mo$49/month

Locked for life at signup.

  • 200 verified review tokens / month
  • Verified-transaction anchoring on every review
  • Unbranded embeddable review wall
  • Full API access
  • Concierge onboarding (we personally set up everything)
  • Founding badge on your public Rogger profile
  • Top placement in the Rogger customer directory
  • 14-day free trial — no card required
97 of 100 slots remaining0/100 claimed

After this fills: $149/month publicly.

Pay as you go
$0.90/ token

No monthly fee. Card on file after 14-day trial.

Growth
$399/ month

600 tokens · multi-location · priority moderation

Zero risk to start.

14-day free trial. 10 tokens included. No card until you decide to continue. Cancel anytime — month-to-month, no lock-in.

  • 14-day trial
  • No card
  • 10 tokens included
  • $49 founding lock-for-life
  • Cancel anytime
  • AU-hosted

“Reply to any email from Rogger and I personally respond. Every founding member gets my direct contact. Not a support queue — me.”

Abraham Zacharia, Founder, Rogger · [email protected]

Your reviews are either tied to real transactions or they aren't.
Right now, they aren't.

Every day without a verified-transaction layer is a day a ~$89broker pricing, public attack can damage your revenue. 14-day free trial. No card. 10 tokens included. 60 seconds to your first transaction-anchored review.

  • 14-day trial
  • No card
  • 10 tokens included
  • $49 founding lock-for-life
  • Cancel anytime
  • AU-hosted